<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The iPad. Hit or miss?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designapplause.com/2010/the-ipad-hit-or-miss/7794/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designapplause.com/2010/the-ipad-hit-or-miss/7794/</link>
	<description>Heightening awareness of design-driven objects.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:57:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Designapplause &#124; the Ipad . Hit Or Miss?</title>
		<link>http://designapplause.com/2010/the-ipad-hit-or-miss/7794/comment-page-1/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>Designapplause &#124; the Ipad . Hit Or Miss?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designapplause.com/?p=7794#comment-1875</guid>
		<description>[...] The iPad . Hit or miss? apple innovations always polarizing. mac zealots, me included, gripe at first-look. looking back, we hated when the disc bay was removed and we had to use CD&#8217;s. we had to buy new printers / scanners because we now &#8230;More [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The iPad . Hit or miss? apple innovations always polarizing. mac zealots, me included, gripe at first-look. looking back, we hated when the disc bay was removed and we had to use CD&#8217;s. we had to buy new printers / scanners because we now &#8230;More [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

